Skip to main content

No one misled me

Marilyn Vann, president of the Descendants of Freedmen of the Five Civilized Tribes, has long fought racism from both governmental officials and indigenous figures. In this instance, she claims, Cherokee leaders misled voters by insisting "freedmen don't have Indian blood", "the freedmen were forced on the tribe", "the freedmen do not have a treaty right to citizenship", "the people have never voted on citizenship provisions in the history of the tribe", and "the amendment will create an all Indian tribe." Cherokee voters were also influenced by the racist charge "that the freedmen if not ejected, would use up all of the tribal service monies."

for the rest of the story:
http://counterpunch.com/katz03172007.html

(Cherokee leaders didn't mislead me about freedmen, not being of Indian Blood, that came down in my family, freedmen weren't Indian but they got on the Dawes Roll and got land, although I have a white great grandmother that didn't get on the Dawes because she was not Indian, she was intermarried Cherokee, my Cherokee family didn't have any slaves - Cherokees do that, pass things down in their families - that's come down at least 6 generations now - whites intermarried - Cherokee didn't adopt folks - so I guess our version according to the Freedmen is wrong - hmm, this is interesting - is congress going to give my grandmother's descendants reparations? I doubt it.

The other things she lists here, I've never heard from any Tribal Official either.

It is true however, that Congress sets out certain Tax funds for Indians, so if they're not Indian they're taking funds that Indians can use else where, *use up all* is a bit exaggerated. At least this writer believes that funding set aside for Indians should be used by Indians - and to call that racist is indeed a tiresome rally cry. Just watching my Tax dollars here - I mean isn't that what Watson claims she's doing by getting involved in this - watching our Tax dollars. I think it was Bob Jones University that lost it's funding because of a Black discrimination issue, however, that was a majority white school, not an ethnic Nation with about 200 years of Indian Policy shoved down it's throat.

However, I've never heard this from any of our Tribal Officials - rumors abound in Indian Country and you really have to be careful whose saying what, which would seem to indicate she's not quite as familiar with Indian Country as she claims. Indians are known for having independent opinions and in most cases we don't hesitate to speak out, maybe not in such a public way but their opinion is known and we respect each others opinions and move on.

I think this is whistling in the wind on her part.

And speaking of historical facts and the right to vote - Indians were not even considered US Citizens until around the 1920s - my grandfather who was born in 1902 wasn't even a US Citizen until he was in his 20s - and I don't recall any Civil War to gain him the right to vote.)

Popular posts from this blog

Americanization of Native Americans

Americanization can refer to the policies of the United States government and public opinion that there is a standard set of cultural values that should be held in common by all citizens. Education was and is viewed as the primary method in the acculturation process. These opinions were harshly applied when it came to Americanization of Native Americans compared to immigrant populations who arrived with their "non-American traditions". The Americanization policies said that when indigenous people learned American customs and values they would soon merge tribal traditions with European-American culture and peacefully melt into the greater society. For example in the 1800s and early 1900s, traditional religious ceremonies were outlawed and it was mandatory for children to attend English speaking boarding schools where native languages and cultural traditions were forbidden. The Dawes Act of 1887 , which allotted tribal lands to individuals and resulted in an estimated total o

Indian Boarding Schools - the US Solution to the Indian Problem

American Indian Boarding Schools Haunt Many by Charla Bear This is the first in a two-part report. For the photos with this piece and the rest of the story: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=16516865 May 13, 2008 Col. Richard H. Pratt founded the first of the off-reservation Native American boarding schools based on the philosophy that, according to a speech he made in 1892, "all the Indian there is in the race should be dead." CORBIS 'Kill the Indian...Save the Man' According to Col. Richard Pratt's speech in 1892: "A great general has said that the only good Indian is a dead one, and that high sanction of his destruction has been an enormous factor in promoting Indian massacres. In a sense, I agree with the sentiment, but only in this: that all the Indian there is in the race should be dead. Kill the Indian in him, and save the man." From Need to 'National Tragedy' Early in the history of American Indian boarding schools, the

A Call to Action

Happy New Year! I hope everyone has had a wonderful holiday season. Many of us go back to work this week (those that had any time off at all, that is!), and it is now time for action. I am going to request that each of you, now that you have a fuller understanding of the issues between the Cherokee Nation and the UKB, take the time this week to compose letters of protest to both the Assistant Secretary for the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Larry EchoHawk, as well as the elected officials of the Cherokee Nation, in both the executive and legislative branches. In the 2000s, the UKB has attempted to place about 76 acres of land that they own as private property, and upon which their headquarters sits, into “trust.” Placing land into trust means that a parcel of property is held by the United States on behalf of a tribe. All Indian reservations are trust properties – legally held by the United States. All Indian casinos are required by federal law to be established only on trust prope