Skip to main content

Ssssssshhhh - don't tell Congress

Constitutional mythbusters
Tucson, Arizona
Published: 09.14.2008

http://www.azstarnet.com/allheadlines/257155

The U.S. Constitution grants Congress and the president authority over American Indian tribes.

Myth. The U.S. Constitution only gives Congress the power to manage commerce with the Indian tribes and gives the president, with the consent of the U.S. Senate, the power to make treaties with Indian tribes. In a now-infamous 19th century case called United States v. Kagama, the Supreme Court said that it could not find an explicit provision in the Constitution that recognized federal authority over Indian tribes, but nevertheless concluded that the power must exist.

This notion, later labeled "the it-must-be-somewhere doctrine" conflicts with the more traditional understanding that the Constitution should be viewed as a document granting only limited and enumerated powers. As a result, the federal authority over Indian tribes is built on a tenuous constitutional footing. Nevertheless, Indian tribes have generally acceded to the exercise of federal power as long as the United States continues to meet most of its treaty obligations and continues to support their more limited independence.

The Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized that Indian tribes pre-existed the United States and the states themselves. Thus, their powers are inherent powers arising from their own "tribal sovereignty," not from the Constitution.

Moreover, tribal governments may have inspired the formation of the United States itself. Only after spending time among the Six Nations of the Iroquois did founding father Benjamin Franklin realize that states could both maintain independent sovereign existence and also form a "more permanent union." This idea, borrowed from the Iroquois, has produced one of the powerful nations in world history.

Kevin K. Washburn,
Rosenstiel Distinguished Professor of Law

Popular posts from this blog

Americanization of Native Americans

Americanization can refer to the policies of the United States government and public opinion that there is a standard set of cultural values that should be held in common by all citizens. Education was and is viewed as the primary method in the acculturation process. These opinions were harshly applied when it came to Americanization of Native Americans compared to immigrant populations who arrived with their "non-American traditions". The Americanization policies said that when indigenous people learned American customs and values they would soon merge tribal traditions with European-American culture and peacefully melt into the greater society. For example in the 1800s and early 1900s, traditional religious ceremonies were outlawed and it was mandatory for children to attend English speaking boarding schools where native languages and cultural traditions were forbidden. The Dawes Act of 1887 , which allotted tribal lands to individuals and resulted in an estimated total o...

Indian Boarding Schools - the US Solution to the Indian Problem

American Indian Boarding Schools Haunt Many by Charla Bear This is the first in a two-part report. For the photos with this piece and the rest of the story: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=16516865 May 13, 2008 Col. Richard H. Pratt founded the first of the off-reservation Native American boarding schools based on the philosophy that, according to a speech he made in 1892, "all the Indian there is in the race should be dead." CORBIS 'Kill the Indian...Save the Man' According to Col. Richard Pratt's speech in 1892: "A great general has said that the only good Indian is a dead one, and that high sanction of his destruction has been an enormous factor in promoting Indian massacres. In a sense, I agree with the sentiment, but only in this: that all the Indian there is in the race should be dead. Kill the Indian in him, and save the man." From Need to 'National Tragedy' Early in the history of American Indian boarding schools, the...

UKB and Cherokee Nation Today

Hello, everyone – I hope you all had a wonderful Christmas and didn’t overdo too much. It was a foodfest in my neighborhood and it was really fun! In this installment we will bring the story of the UKB and the Cherokee Nation to the present. As the Cherokee Nation began to recover its sovereign powers in the 1970s, after having being squelched for most of the twentieth century by the “bureaucratic imperialism” of the BIA as the judge in the Harjo case described it, the UKB was dwindling. As the Cherokee Nation elected its first Chief since statehood, developed a superseding Constitution, reinstated its citizens, reconstituted its Tribal Council (also a result of the Harjo case), established Cherokee Nation Industries and investigated other economic development enterprises, the UKB receded and was basically defunct by the end of the 1970s. But in 1979, there was a particularly nasty runoff in the Principal Chief’s race between incumbent Ross Swimmer and his opponent, Jim Gordon. Swi...