Skip to main content

Well, this is interesting...old piece but interesting

Under fire, Cherokees hire CBC’s former director in lobbying push
By Kevin Bogardus

Posted: 10/17/07 07:46 PM [ET]

The Cherokee Nation has hired the Congressional Black Caucus’s (CBC) former top official as part of a lobbying effort against punitive legislation proposed on Capitol Hill.

Paul Brathwaite, once the CBC’s executive director, is part of a five-person team at the Podesta Group that has registered to lobby against a bill, among other provisions, that would punish the tribe for amending its constitution so that it effectively excluded thousands of black Americans. The group is known as the “Freedmen,” descendants of Cherokee-owned slaves who later gained citizenship rights.

The tribe amended its constitution in March to exclude from the tribe anyone who did not have a Cherokee ancestor based on 1906 census rolls. The new definition meant that 2,800 Freedmen would not be counted as part of the 270,000-member Cherokee Nation.

In response, members of the CBC have pushed a bill that would cut off all federal funds to the tribe — roughly $300 million per year. The legislation would also suspend the tribe’s gaming license and authorize investigations into its gambling business by the Department of Justice and the Government Accountability Office.

The bill now has 23 co-sponsors, but has yet to be marked up by the House Judiciary and Natural Resources committees, which share jurisdiction on the issue. Rep. Diane Watson (D-Calif.), the bill’s chief sponsor, has distributed a “Dear Colleague” letter to other CBC members and is pushing for a joint committee hearing to be held early next year, according to an aide for the congresswoman.

“The stakes are extremely high,” said Chad Smith, the principal chief of the Cherokee Nation. He added that Watson’s bill could cut off healthcare funds for 126,000 Cherokees and housing subsidies for another 7,300.

Smith said his tribe was impressed by the Podesta Group as a whole, and did not hire the firm solely because of Brathwaite’s relationship with CBC members.

“We looked at the firm and their ability to get our message out, not necessarily the individuals,” Smith said.

The extent of Brathwaite’s involvement is unclear. His former boss, Rep. Mel Watt (D-N.C.), has not met with the lobbyist and said he has “no impression that [Brathwaite] will be personally involved with this dispute.”

“We separate relationships with lobbyists, whether Paul, [Tony Podesta] or the chief himself,” added Watt.

But Braithwaite did meet with the staff for Watson, who proposed legislation in June condemning the Cherokees for their March vote.

Tempers began to rise in September when the House considered American Indian housing legislation. Lawmakers passed by voice vote a Watt amendment that would cut off the Cherokees’ housing funds. (passed by a voice vote? - well, that sounds like a well reasoned approach)

But Rep. Dan Boren (D-Okla.) amended the provision so it would not take effect until litigation between the Cherokees and the Freedmen is settled.

Watson kept up the pressure, however, and hosted a panel in late September to discuss the Freedmen at the CBC’s annual legislative conference. (Indians need not apply - although it's their governments that are affected)

That week, the Cherokees countered with full-page ads in The Hill and Roll Call that condemned Watson’s bill as well as a press release questioning her panel’s fairness. Days later, Watson went to the House floor to lambaste the lobbying campaign. (good, we'll have a record of Cherokee bashing)

Even before hiring the Podesta Group, the tribe had already built up a strong Washington presence. The tribe spent $1.2 million on litigation, lobbying and public relations for fiscal 2007 and plans to spend $1.5 million for 2008, according to budget documents provided by Cherokee representatives.

Lanny Davis, a partner at Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe and a top fundraiser for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s (D-N.Y.) presidential campaign, is handling much of the litigation for the tribe. Former Rep. Brad Carson (D-Okla.), now chief executive officer of the Cherokee Nation Businesses, is also part of the effort.

Davis recommended the Podesta Group for the job to the Cherokees. Its founder, Anthony Podesta, is a well-known Democratic lobbyist and fundraiser.

Despite the constitutional change, Davis noted that thousands of blacks remain in the tribe. He also noted the tribe has granted temporary citizenship to the Freedmen until all litigation is completed, and offered to pay for genealogical research for those wishing to find out whether they have a Cherokee ancestor.

“It is completely false and completely unfair to suggest racial motivation by the Cherokees,” said Davis about the March vote.

But the conflict between the Freedmen and the Cherokee tribe has become more complicated as lawsuits have proliferated in both federal and tribal courts. Smith, the Cherokee chief, argues that congressional intervention in the matter would disrupt the judicial process.

“The courts should just sort it out,” he said. (ah, the CBC has no confidence in the courts)

But Watson said the tribe’s March amendment breaches an 1866 treaty with the U.S. government that granted citizenship rights to the Freedmen.

“If you break your agreement with us, we should break our agreement with you,” said the California Democrat. Smith argues that the 1866 treaty did not grant full Cherokee citizenship to the Freedmen.

Meanwhile, the Freedmen have picked up additional support in their battle. The Downey McGrath Group has offered to work in support of Watson’s bill pro bono. (whoa, pro bono, the CBC in need of funds or something - what's this pro bono stuff - oh, my mistake this is Washington and the need to be seen)

“We are going to prove a good cause does not need money to succeed,” said Tom Downey, former Democratic congressman from New York and the group’s chairman. (Well, that's for sure, however, you do need the courts to figure out what the law is you're trying to shove down our throats. When did Cherokee Bashing become a good cause - yikes - anyone taking note of this!)

Popular posts from this blog

Americanization of Native Americans

Americanization can refer to the policies of the United States government and public opinion that there is a standard set of cultural values that should be held in common by all citizens. Education was and is viewed as the primary method in the acculturation process. These opinions were harshly applied when it came to Americanization of Native Americans compared to immigrant populations who arrived with their "non-American traditions". The Americanization policies said that when indigenous people learned American customs and values they would soon merge tribal traditions with European-American culture and peacefully melt into the greater society. For example in the 1800s and early 1900s, traditional religious ceremonies were outlawed and it was mandatory for children to attend English speaking boarding schools where native languages and cultural traditions were forbidden. The Dawes Act of 1887 , which allotted tribal lands to individuals and resulted in an estimated total o

Indian Boarding Schools - the US Solution to the Indian Problem

American Indian Boarding Schools Haunt Many by Charla Bear This is the first in a two-part report. For the photos with this piece and the rest of the story: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=16516865 May 13, 2008 Col. Richard H. Pratt founded the first of the off-reservation Native American boarding schools based on the philosophy that, according to a speech he made in 1892, "all the Indian there is in the race should be dead." CORBIS 'Kill the Indian...Save the Man' According to Col. Richard Pratt's speech in 1892: "A great general has said that the only good Indian is a dead one, and that high sanction of his destruction has been an enormous factor in promoting Indian massacres. In a sense, I agree with the sentiment, but only in this: that all the Indian there is in the race should be dead. Kill the Indian in him, and save the man." From Need to 'National Tragedy' Early in the history of American Indian boarding schools, the

A Call to Action

Happy New Year! I hope everyone has had a wonderful holiday season. Many of us go back to work this week (those that had any time off at all, that is!), and it is now time for action. I am going to request that each of you, now that you have a fuller understanding of the issues between the Cherokee Nation and the UKB, take the time this week to compose letters of protest to both the Assistant Secretary for the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Larry EchoHawk, as well as the elected officials of the Cherokee Nation, in both the executive and legislative branches. In the 2000s, the UKB has attempted to place about 76 acres of land that they own as private property, and upon which their headquarters sits, into “trust.” Placing land into trust means that a parcel of property is held by the United States on behalf of a tribe. All Indian reservations are trust properties – legally held by the United States. All Indian casinos are required by federal law to be established only on trust prope