Skip to main content

Another Retreat from Treaty Obligations by the US

Warne: Tribes' healthcare coming up short

By DONALD WARNE

Progressive Media Project

http://www.star-telegram.com/245/story/667387.html

How long you live should not depend on how rich you are. But recent studies show that the richer you are, the longer you live.

For American Indians, this is not news. Nearly a third of our people live in poverty, compared with 12 percent of the rest of the country, and we suffer alarming gaps in life expectancy. In Arizona, where I live, the average age at death is 72.2 years for the general population and 54.7 years for American Indians. Even people in Bangladesh and Ghana live longer.

Death rates from preventable causes such as diabetes, alcoholism and mental illness are dramatically higher among American Indians than in the rest of the population. Despite this gross inequality, American Indians are the only population born with a legal right to healthcare in this country.

The treaties between the tribal nations and the federal government involved exchanges of vast amounts of Indian land and natural resources for federal guarantees of social services, including housing, education and healthcare. The Bureau of Indian Affairs and the Indian Health Service were established to administer the federal government's trust responsibility to provide healthcare and other vital services to American Indians. But today, the Indian Health Service is underfunded to the tune of $2 billion.

Relative to the entire federal budget of $3.1 trillion, $2 billion is a tiny investment in Indian health. This is not a question of money. It's a question of priorities.

We can rapidly spend $150 billion to send taxpayers a $600 rebate to stimulate the economy, and we can spend about $2 billion per week on the war in Iraq. But we can't fulfill our responsibility to honor our treaties with the country's first inhabitants, even though that additional $2 billion could make life-and-death differences.

Opponents of this funding claim that tribal casinos make it unnecessary. But most tribes do not have casinos, and most casinos are not making significant profits. And even if that argument were solid, successful tribal economic development does not fulfill the federal responsibility to provide healthcare to American Indians.

Other opponents argue that successful casinos should fund the other tribes. Is this not advocating socialism? Until the rest of the nation is willing to socialize medicine and other services, tribes should not be held to a higher standard.
Each tribe is a sovereign entity, and it is not the tribes' responsibility to provide healthcare to one another. It is the federal government's responsibility.
It ought to live up to that.

Dr. Donald Warne (Oglala Lakota) is president and CEO of American Indian Health Management & Policy ( www.aihmp.com) in Phoenix. pmproj@progressive.org

Popular posts from this blog

Americanization of Native Americans

Americanization can refer to the policies of the United States government and public opinion that there is a standard set of cultural values that should be held in common by all citizens. Education was and is viewed as the primary method in the acculturation process. These opinions were harshly applied when it came to Americanization of Native Americans compared to immigrant populations who arrived with their "non-American traditions". The Americanization policies said that when indigenous people learned American customs and values they would soon merge tribal traditions with European-American culture and peacefully melt into the greater society. For example in the 1800s and early 1900s, traditional religious ceremonies were outlawed and it was mandatory for children to attend English speaking boarding schools where native languages and cultural traditions were forbidden. The Dawes Act of 1887 , which allotted tribal lands to individuals and resulted in an estimated total o

Indian Boarding Schools - the US Solution to the Indian Problem

American Indian Boarding Schools Haunt Many by Charla Bear This is the first in a two-part report. For the photos with this piece and the rest of the story: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=16516865 May 13, 2008 Col. Richard H. Pratt founded the first of the off-reservation Native American boarding schools based on the philosophy that, according to a speech he made in 1892, "all the Indian there is in the race should be dead." CORBIS 'Kill the Indian...Save the Man' According to Col. Richard Pratt's speech in 1892: "A great general has said that the only good Indian is a dead one, and that high sanction of his destruction has been an enormous factor in promoting Indian massacres. In a sense, I agree with the sentiment, but only in this: that all the Indian there is in the race should be dead. Kill the Indian in him, and save the man." From Need to 'National Tragedy' Early in the history of American Indian boarding schools, the

A Call to Action

Happy New Year! I hope everyone has had a wonderful holiday season. Many of us go back to work this week (those that had any time off at all, that is!), and it is now time for action. I am going to request that each of you, now that you have a fuller understanding of the issues between the Cherokee Nation and the UKB, take the time this week to compose letters of protest to both the Assistant Secretary for the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Larry EchoHawk, as well as the elected officials of the Cherokee Nation, in both the executive and legislative branches. In the 2000s, the UKB has attempted to place about 76 acres of land that they own as private property, and upon which their headquarters sits, into “trust.” Placing land into trust means that a parcel of property is held by the United States on behalf of a tribe. All Indian reservations are trust properties – legally held by the United States. All Indian casinos are required by federal law to be established only on trust prope