Skip to main content

Watson Lacks Understanding of Freedmen Issue

THE PEOPLE SPEAK: Obama knows what Watson’s bill tries to do

In a recent opinion piece by Rep. Diane Watson, D-Calif., she criticized Sen. Barack Obama for being “wrong” on the freedmen issue. Sadly, it is Watson, not Obama, who lacks a complete understanding.

Politicians like Obama need to not only reject HR2824, but to also acknowledge the mistaken notions and faulty premises on which it is based.

Tribal governments retain the integrity of their culture and heritage by establishing guidelines for tribal membership. In the case of the Five Civilized Tribes, the final rolls of the tribes and freedmen are used as the principle documents for citizenship.

The tribes require that an individual be able to trace their lineage to an ancestor listed on the by-blood rolls in order to be a member. The only time in Cherokee history membership has been opened to non-Indians was between 2006 and 2007, when a court case in effect granted citizenship rights to descendants of the freedmen and intermarried whites listed on the Cherokee rolls.

A 2007 vote by the Cherokee people reiterated citizenship was for by-blood descendants, thereby revoking those memberships. Watson’s implication that “citizenship [was] suddenly removed because they were descended from slaves” is dangerously misinformed.

Contrary to a statement in her destructive legislation, not all African Americans were placed in the freedmen section of the rolls. If an African American applying to be on the roll was an Indian by blood, they were placed in the by-blood section of the roll, not the freedmen section.

Descendants of any Cherokee — by blood descended from slaves or not — can be members in the Cherokee Nation. Watson is perpetuating the malicious deceit that the Cherokee Nation has expelled African-American descendants of slaves from the tribe.

Obama is transcendentally wise for understanding the situation enough to reject Watson’s bill and the Congressional Black Caucus’ urging to cut the Cherokee Nation’s federal funding until they extend tribal membership to non-Indian freedmen. Rather than rebuking Obama, Watson should be as astute on the issue as Obama.

Hannah Flanagan-Flores

Bellflower, Calif.

http://www.muskogeephoenix.com/opinion/local_story_163170650.html

Popular posts from this blog

Americanization of Native Americans

Americanization can refer to the policies of the United States government and public opinion that there is a standard set of cultural values that should be held in common by all citizens. Education was and is viewed as the primary method in the acculturation process. These opinions were harshly applied when it came to Americanization of Native Americans compared to immigrant populations who arrived with their "non-American traditions". The Americanization policies said that when indigenous people learned American customs and values they would soon merge tribal traditions with European-American culture and peacefully melt into the greater society. For example in the 1800s and early 1900s, traditional religious ceremonies were outlawed and it was mandatory for children to attend English speaking boarding schools where native languages and cultural traditions were forbidden. The Dawes Act of 1887 , which allotted tribal lands to individuals and resulted in an estimated total o...
Read more

Indian Boarding Schools - the US Solution to the Indian Problem

American Indian Boarding Schools Haunt Many by Charla Bear This is the first in a two-part report. For the photos with this piece and the rest of the story: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=16516865 May 13, 2008 Col. Richard H. Pratt founded the first of the off-reservation Native American boarding schools based on the philosophy that, according to a speech he made in 1892, "all the Indian there is in the race should be dead." CORBIS 'Kill the Indian...Save the Man' According to Col. Richard Pratt's speech in 1892: "A great general has said that the only good Indian is a dead one, and that high sanction of his destruction has been an enormous factor in promoting Indian massacres. In a sense, I agree with the sentiment, but only in this: that all the Indian there is in the race should be dead. Kill the Indian in him, and save the man." From Need to 'National Tragedy' Early in the history of American Indian boarding schools, the...
Read more

UKB and Cherokee Nation Today

Hello, everyone – I hope you all had a wonderful Christmas and didn’t overdo too much. It was a foodfest in my neighborhood and it was really fun! In this installment we will bring the story of the UKB and the Cherokee Nation to the present. As the Cherokee Nation began to recover its sovereign powers in the 1970s, after having being squelched for most of the twentieth century by the “bureaucratic imperialism” of the BIA as the judge in the Harjo case described it, the UKB was dwindling. As the Cherokee Nation elected its first Chief since statehood, developed a superseding Constitution, reinstated its citizens, reconstituted its Tribal Council (also a result of the Harjo case), established Cherokee Nation Industries and investigated other economic development enterprises, the UKB receded and was basically defunct by the end of the 1970s. But in 1979, there was a particularly nasty runoff in the Principal Chief’s race between incumbent Ross Swimmer and his opponent, Jim Gordon. Swi...
Read more